jump to navigation

Science and Faith November 25, 2007

Posted by Philip Ryan in General.
trackback

This appeared in the New York Times recently (and has some bearing on a recent post here):

In other words, the laws [of physics] should have an explanation from within the universe and not involve appealing to an external agency. The specifics of that explanation are a matter for future research. But until science comes up with a testable theory of the laws of the universe, its claim to be free of faith is manifestly bogus.

– Philip Ryan, Web Editor

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Tom Armstrong - November 26, 2007

The Best Science always recognizes conditions as they are. That is not the same as any kind of faith. Always, there is a vast patch of territory that is inadequately explained or wholly unexplained in Science’s path.

Science moves in the direction of the truth of things and does so with a manifest disregard for faith.

2. Tom Armstrong - December 4, 2007

… however, I do find ridiculous the idea that only what is testable is true, beyond the ‘need’ of faith. Wasn’t the earth spherical BEFORE Copernicus and BEFORE Columbus sailed the ocean blue?

Science should be in pursuit of Truth, not Truth in pursuit of certification from Science.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: